The Resignation of Nicola Sturgeon: A Reflection

The Resignation of Nicola Sturgeon: A Reflection

Nicola Sturgeon announced her intention to resign as leader of the Scottish National Party (SNP). As Scotland’s longest-serving female First Minister, Ms. Sturgeon has been an influential voice for gender identity rights and a champion of the independence movement from Great Britain. In light of her resignation, it is important to reflect on what could have been done differently in order to achieve her goals and keep her in office.

Nicola Sturgeon became the first female First Minister of Scotland in 2014 after taking over leadership from Alex Salmond. She was committed to advancing gender identity rights and was a vocal supporter of the independence movement from Great Britain. Through her role as First Minister she focused on initiatives such as free college tuition for all students living in Scotland, increasing investment into mental health services, and strengthening environmental protections. Under Ms. Sturgeon’s leadership, gender identity regulations were loosened and more inclusive legislation was passed in order to support minority groups.

Reasons Behind the Resignation

Ms. Sturgeon cited diminishing public support for independence as one reason behind her resignation decision. Despite a majority of Scots indicating they would vote “Yes” if given another chance at a referendum, Ms. Sturgeon felt that there weren’t enough votes to give herself or the SNP a mandate going forward with their bid for independence from Great Britain. Additionally, she called for a General Election later this year that would serve as a de facto referendum but received lukewarm public opinion and did not make any headway on this front either. Finally, COVID-19 had taken its toll on Ms. Sturgeon personally and she saw this as an opportune time to step away from leadership responsibilities in order to focus on personal matters instead.

Reflection on What Could Have Been Done Differently

Many are questioning whether or not different strategies should have been employed with regard to the independence movement or if more could have been done to further gender identity rights initiatives under Ms. Sturgeon’s tenure as First Minister. It could be argued that perhaps mistakes were made when deciding how exactly to proceed with gaining public favour for a new referendum or if other methods besides loosening gender identity regulations should have been explored. Ultimately, however, hindsight is 20/20 and there is no way of knowing what might have been had different choices been made along the way.

Although we may never know why Nicola Sturgeon decided it was time to move on from her post, we can take pride in everything she accomplished while leading Scotland since 2014. We now look ahead with anticipation towards what comes next for Scottish politics and wish Ms . Sturgeon all the best in whatever endeavour she decides upon next.


Back to blog

Follow @ikrush